Osama bin Laden [Updated May 8, 2011]

I’m not going to write a response to the killing of Osama bin Laden, but will rather link to what others have already posted. First, two SDA responses with different perspectives (both at Spectrum):

Three responses by Christians:

Additional perspectives:

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Current Issues and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Osama bin Laden [Updated May 8, 2011]

  1. Margay Wilson says:

    While we should love our enemies and not necessarily rejoice over their death, we need to recognize what the Bible has to say about murderers:
    “Moreover you shall take no ransom for the life of a murderer who is guility of death, but he shall surely be put to death.” Numbers 35:31. This is just one text. For some people there is a point of no return and evil has to be dealt with. This man was NOT repentant of his evil acts. He was fully under the control of Satan! God is merciful and longsuffering with man, but at a certain point He will practice justice, and after all, that is how He will deal with sin and sinners in the end. He takes no delight in the death of the wicked, but wickedness HAS to be eradicated once and for all!

  2. Jeff Boyd says:

    Thanks for commenting, Margay. I presume your last sentence was about the judgment at the “end of time” rather than about bin Laden, correct?

  3. Jeff Boyd says:

    This is the comment I left at Spectrum in relation to the two articles listed in this post:

    Wow, so many elements under discussion–US foreign policy, Islam, emotional responses to stressful stimuli, pacifism vs just war theory, nonviolence, self-defense, ethics of Jesus, OT ethics, early church history, Adventist history, citizenship in kingdom of heaven vs national govs, and so much more.

    Many comments from different perspectives reveal historical study, philosophical reflection, and personal engagement. For others who are interested in these topics but who haven’t yet gone beyond personal reflection, I recommend a few readings (these are about Christian ethics, not foreign policy):

    Two complimentary books on history and thought by a Mennonite and a Catholic — Christian Attitudes to War, Peace, and Revolution (Yoder) & Christian Attitudes Toward War and Peace (Bainton). Two complimentary books on ethics by a Mennonite and a Catholic — Love Your Enemies: Discipleship, Pacifism, and Just War Theory (Cahill) & The War of the Lamb: The Ethics of Nonviolence and Peacemaking (Yoder). Two additional chapters from Yoder’s The Politics of Jesus — Ch. 10, “Let Every Soul be Subject: Romans 13 and the Authority of the State,” and Ch. 12, “The War of the Lamb.”

    Three articles on various elements of the above discussion that support the side of pacifism (not passivism) and nonviolence — (1) “Military Service in the Church Orders” (Alan Kreider [Mennonite] on early church history, Journal of Religious Ethics, 2003, 31, 3, 415-442). (2) “Christian Nonviolence” (Walter Wink [Methodist] on Sermon on the Mount, Z Net, Dec 17, 2004) — http://www.zcommunications.org/christian-nonviolence-by-walter-wink. (3) “Does Following Jesus Rule Out Serving in the Military if a War is Just?” (Greg Boyd [Baptist]) — http://www.gregboyd.org/essays/kingdom-living/does-following-jesus-rule-….

    For those interested in early church thought, the quotes below may be of interest, though they lack historical and theological context and are no substitute for the analysis in the books listed above:
    http://rachelstanton.wordpress.com/2007/01/21/the-early-church-on-violence/
    http://taddelay.com/2010/01/24/the-writings-of-the-early-church-fathers-
    http://rogueminister.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/quotes-the-early-church-on

    I’m not saying these materials answer the debates. I just think some people who really care about these issues might benefit from more data to work with. And I’ve offered Christian sources of a certain flavor to be sure, since books like Just and Unjust Wars (Walzer) weren’t on the list. Also, I have not yet read it, but I hear good things about What about Hitler? (Brimlow).

    With many biases and much to learn, Jeff

  4. Jeff Boyd says:

    Warning: This has some R-rated language, but Maher makes some strong points about what it means to follow Jesus and not just be a fan — http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/05/maher-bin-laden-gandhi-christian-hypocrisy/.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s